Use of food stamps is soaring across the nation, and not just in
urban pockets and rural backwaters where poverty has long been a
way of life. The demand for food stamps is becoming common in the
suburbs too, where the ranks of the needy have grown with the
deepest recession since the Great Depression.
Use of food stamps is soaring across the nation, and not just in urban pockets and rural backwaters where poverty has long been a way of life. The demand for food stamps is becoming common in the suburbs too, where the ranks of the needy have grown with the deepest recession since the Great Depression.

In California, food stamp usage jumped 24 percent in the last 12 months. But it has grown even more in 25 other states. Neighboring Nevada had a 53 percent increase. Oregon? A 31 percent increase in the last year.

When it comes to food stamps, California has consistently lagged behind most other states in making sure that more of its residents receive assistance when they are eligible for it.

The United States Department of Agriculture issued its annual food stamp participation report this month and, once again, California ranked near the bottom. It is estimated that, in 2007, the most recent year surveyed, only 48 percent of California residents eligible for food stamps received them. Only Wyoming ranked lower.

Among the working poor, California ranked dead last, with only 33 percent of those eligible receiving food assistance.

The state’s bureaucratic barriers are largely responsible.

It is not just the poor and hungry who suffer when eligible Californians don’t get food stamps. The California economy is also shortchanged.

In a recent report, the nonprofit group California Food Policy Advocates calculated that the state lost $3.7 billion in direct federal support in 2007, when the 2.9 million Californians who were eligible did not receive food stamps that year.

That’s money that could have gone to California supermarkets and farmers.

Although some deride food stamps as wasteful welfare, they are an essential part of the safety net, particularly in tough times. In California, more could be helped if the state removed some needless obstacles.

This editorial first appeared in the Fresno Bee.

Previous articlePay attention to the rules when inheriting an IRA
Next articleThomas Lambrick
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here