It’s just this simple: The Valley Transportation Authority can’t
afford to build BART to San Jose.
The 16.3-mile construction project will be bankrupt by 2009 and
be in a $1.9-billion hole by 2013, according to a report by VTA
Chief Financial Officer Scott Buher.
It’s just this simple: The Valley Transportation Authority can’t afford to build BART to San Jose.
The 16.3-mile construction project will be bankrupt by 2009 and be in a $1.9-billion hole by 2013, according to a report by VTA Chief Financial Officer Scott Buher.
The rosy economic forecasts used to sell voters the 30-year half-cent sales tax measure that was to fund a BART to San Jose extension – along with many other public transportation projects – have turned decidedly more realistic in the wake of the dot-com bust.
As Margaret Okuzumi of the BayRail Alliance has pointed out, even if every penny of Measure A tax revenues were devoted to BART, VTA couldn’t build BART in a reasonable time frame. But those revenues were also supposed to pay for Caltrain and Light Rail improvements, not just BART.
There’s no guarantee commuters will embrace a BART line between San Jose and the East Bay. After all, ridership on the new BART extension to the San Francisco International Airport turned out to be far below expectations. Ridership is 40 percent below projections.
But if the BART extension was reduced or eliminated, the VTA would have plenty of money to extend, electrify and improve Caltrain, a public transit system that is already well-established, well-run and embraced by commuters.
The money’s not there – we can’t afford to build BART to San Jose without generating billions of dollars of red ink in capital expenses, to say nothing of the size of the operating deficit it’s likely to spawn.
Yes, it would be nice to have BART service in San Jose, but BART is not a panacea; it won’t improve already heavily utilized Caltrain service, and it does little for residents in the northern, southern and western parts of Santa Clara County – all of whom will be paying the half-cent sales tax for the next 30 years.
If the goal of the VTA is to reduce the number of cars on the road and increase usage of public transportation, then BART looks like a poor investment. Let’s look at where the growth is – South Santa Clara County and San Benito County – and where those commuters are trying to go – jobs in San Jose and on the Peninsula – and let’s give those commuters some real public transportation options.
South Santa Clara County currently has only one track to San Jose, and not nearly enough trains to give commuters sufficient flexibility to get to and from work.
Let’s get more trains, add tracks and improve the service on the already accepted and well-used Caltrain in South Santa Clara County.
In these tight economic times, let’s invest our scarce public transportation dollars in a project that will have lower cost and higher odds for success.
