Periodic testing of emergency response capabilities is critical
to the readiness and training of those critical public
services.
Periodic testing of emergency response capabilities is critical to the readiness and training of those critical public services. Last Thursday’s exercise simulating an injury accident and release of hazardous materials was necessary and welcome. We commend the responders for approaching the drill seriously and with obvious professionalism. A formal evaluation and after-action report will assess their actions and recommend improvements.
In addition to evaluating the emergency response teams, the report must also deal with the key elements of the test process, including scenario development, location, test protocols and coordination. The exercise of emergency services in simulated situations involves some special risks and considerations. Planning and coordination are especially critical to ensure the drill does not involve excessive risk, that all key parties are aware of the situation, and that procedures to cover for those engaged or instantly abort the test to respond to actual emergencies are well planned and in place.
There were several indications that notification, coordination, and planning by those responsible for initiating and evaluating this test require significant improvement. Several key local agencies were in the dark regarding the test even after it was in progress. It is essential that the evaluators thoroughly review their plans, performance, and processes as well as those of emergency responders.
Testing requires the same kind of detailed planning as actual response.
