In response to Janet Brians’ letter on Wednesday, in which she
claims that the proposed San Benito County Growth Initiative does
not take away agricultural use of agricultural property, I might
agree with that statement were it to stand alone on its own
merit.
Dear Editor:
In response to Janet Brians’ letter on Wednesday, in which she claims that the proposed San Benito County Growth Initiative does not take away agricultural use of agricultural property, I might agree with that statement were it to stand alone on its own merit.
But in context with the proposed measure, the initiative, as I have read and understand it, seeks to limit the rights of farmers and ranchers by initiating “new and improved land-use zones” for the benefit of the environment, to sustain the rural character of the county and lessen the burden of infrastructure management upon county government.
Subsequently, the proposed initiative has the potential to diminish the value of ranchers and farmers respective lands and create and/or further economic hardship among the agricultural community.
I appreciate the value of Joe Thompson’s letters.
My take on his opinion is that he offers a perspective as to why government control of landowners rights is historically flawed with respect to the philosophy of modern economic theory.
To paraphrase, when the law of supply and demand in a capitalistic society is superceded by government intervention and control, ostensibly, for egalitarian and altruistic purposes, it is generally to the detriment of the property owner’s rights and followed by diminished economic value.
If my understanding of Mr. Thompson’s intent is correct, then I am in complete agreement with his view.
And the proposed growth control initiative that Janet Brians’ advocates has the potential to accomplish the same.
I predict that this proposed initiative will be properly scrutinized by local government agencies and opposed by responsible agricultural stakeholders and business leaders and associations such as the Farm Bureau and chambers of Commerce.
When the obvious negative financial impacts to the local economy are realized by an informed voting public, San Benito County citizens will be well served in defeating this proposed measure at the polls next March.
Mike Smith
Hollister
