Ridgemark community homeowners are concerned about the removal of trees on a golf course.

A court hearing Thursday about tree removal at Ridgemark ended in a temporary restraining order and a request to post a $1 million bond.
The Ridgemark Homes Association filed a lawsuit in April against JMK Golf LLC – the company that acquired the Ridgemark Golf & Country Club golf course in the spring of 2009 – asking for a restraining order that would keep the company from cutting down trees on the golf course in front of their houses.
“When you buy a house on the golf course – seventh fairway or something – you might expect that there’s no change but there’s no guarantee,” said Judge Harry Tobias, as he reflected on the homeowners’ expectations that the area in front of their houses would always be a golf course.
The 125 trees in question fall in the fallow part of the golf course, which employees stopped watering in July when Ridgemark closed some of its fairways and moved from a 36-hole course to an 18-hole facility.
Thursday afternoon, the judge issued a temporary restraining order forbidding JMK to trim or cut down any standing tree on the fallow portion of the golf course. Tobias added that homeowners must post a bond valued at $1 million on or before Oct. 16 to keep the injunction in place through the end of the month.
The bond is meant to cover the cost of accidents if one of the trees protected in the restraining order falls on a person or house. The attorney representing the Ridgemark Homes Association, Bradley Matteoni, agreed to ask the homeowners if they’d be willing to post the bond. JMK’s attorney, John Richards, argued the judge’s proposed $1 million bond was not high enough.
“We’re incredibly concerned about the bond as it stands, your honor. I think it should be at least $10 million,” Richards said. “We would like a larger amount.”
Ridgemark resident Melissa Casillas was one of nine in the audience watching the proceedings.
“I can’t really comment on the bond because I don’t know what it would cost,” said Casillas, who noted she would be willing to pay toward saving the trees she loves.
An “order to show cause” hearing – meaning one or both parties will justify the reason they want an ongoing restraining order – will be held at 2 p.m. Oct. 30 at the San Benito County Courthouse.

Previous articleLetter: Response to St. Louise story
Next articleMore sign damage reported in Measure J campaign
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here