Panelists were 7-2 against allowing employers to request the passwords.

Bill Mifsud: “No. We are now living in a technological society but  some things should still remain private. If an employer can’t find  out about a prospective employee through a basic back ground check  then the job applicant should seek employment some where else.”

Nants Foley: “Don’t put anything on the Internet you don’t want  everyone in the world to see. Or better yet, don’t do anything you  don’t want the world to know. Didn’t we already learn that?”

Jim  West: “No, it may be a sign of my lack of imitation or internet  dexterity, but I only have one password for all my different  accounts. I certainly don’t mind giving a prospective employer all  the information they need — but not access to my bank account.”

Marty Richman: “Unfortunately, yes. Employers are concerned with  their decisions and company images; then there are juries second  guessing about what a deep-pocketed employer should have known. There  is no real privacy on social media, it’s an illusion.”

Richard  Herrera: “No. Employers should not be allowed to invade our privacy.  Although it’s unclear at this time, employers who do may have  violated federal law. I will not allow access to Facebook or my email  account to my employer.”

Ruth Erickson: “It’s an invasion of  privacy for the prospective employee and for all those on their  Facebook accounts!”

Richard Place: “No! I believe that it is an invasion of privacy not really necessary for screening a new  employee. This is not like requiring a drug test which is for the  protection of health and safety.”

Steve Staloch: “No. It’s a  blatant invasion of privacy and creates a counter-productive paranoia  and environment of distrust.”

Louise Ledesma: “NO!! Your Facebook  password should not  be required by prospective employees and is against their privacy terms. Facebook has come out  against this practice, and U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal is writing a bill to stop  this practice by employers. He feels it needs to be a federal law but  many states, including California, are in the process of introducing  bills also. This practice not only compromises the potential employee  but also all their ‘friends.’”

Previous articleFree Lance Editorial: Adviser’s hiring underscores HSD’s fiscal ineptitude
Next articleTrustee announces resignation from SBHS board
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here