Yes, there used to be a lot of development and jobs, however,
you failed to mention that the out-of-town builders for the most
part bring in their own employees and what locals they hire are
paid very low hourly wages and most without any benefits. They are
not paid near enough to buy one of the homes they build.
Yes, there used to be a lot of development and jobs here,
although I still don’t see much of anything for youth here except
the YMCA and it’s certainly not the answer for all kids under the
age of 18.
“Yes, there used to be a lot of development and jobs, however, you failed to mention that the out-of-town builders for the most part bring in their own employees and what locals they hire are paid very low hourly wages and most without any benefits. They are not paid near enough to buy one of the homes they build.

Yes, there used to be a lot of development and jobs here, although I still don’t see much of anything for youth here except the YMCA and it’s certainly not the answer for all kids under the age of 18.

I drove up San Juan Canyon the other day to see what is going on. I observed Yes on G signs in the vicinity of Supervisor Kesler’s property, however, as I proceeded on I noticed that the climate changes to No on G and obvious dreams of urban sprawl.

If you can’t afford to farm or ranch it, then sell it to someone that would like the chance to farm or ranch it.

Also, to the No on G people – could you please leave the Yes on G signs alone? I noticed two homes recently that had a Yes on G and a No on G next door to each other. The next day I observed that the Yes on G was ripped off of its lawn holder but the No on G was still there.”

Previous articleGilroy stop for bullet train makes sense
Next articleMeasure G support, protest heats up
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here