Has the digital age deleted romance?
When reading Harper’s Bazaar instead of writing a thesis I came
across a great article where Ashton Kutcher, being the insightful
philosopher that he is, mused on the notion that the digital age
has killed romance.
I was inspired by the concept, his insight, and his apparent
ability to use words like

vulnerability

and

antiquated,

and thought I would do a little musing of my own.
Has the digital age deleted romance?

When reading Harper’s Bazaar instead of writing a thesis I came across a great article where Ashton Kutcher, being the insightful philosopher that he is, mused on the notion that the digital age has killed romance.

I was inspired by the concept, his insight, and his apparent ability to use words like “vulnerability” and “antiquated,” and thought I would do a little musing of my own.

Communication without physical interface has not only shaped our generation, it’s practically defined it. Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of Facebook, won Time Magazine’s Person of the Year for 2010, beating out runners-up like J. Craig Venter and “the Haitian people.”

Evidently, Time and I agree that rebuilding from a catastrophic earthquake and mapping the human genome are less notable ventures than helping me to upload half-dressed pictures of myself and catch my boyfriend cheating.

What this monumental nod to social networking symbolizes is the importance of interconnection today. 

Online groups and viral statuses have helped find missing persons, raise awareness for breast cancer and replaced my contacts list after a puddle monster drowned my iPhone. With this technological evolution, the world has become increasingly connected, making information globally distributable and distanced relationships easier.

But has all this virtual interaction really killed romance? Ilsy Melendez, a Senior at Claremont McKenna College, thinks so.

“For the most part, I think heavy usage of texting and online and wireless services is not conducive to romantic relationships,” she said. “It makes people too accessible sometimes…Where is the mystery?”

Ever the romantic, Joe Swartley, another Claremont McKenna student, agreed. 

“It has definitely killed romance,” he said. “There’s no face-to-face anymore.  No courting.”

These Amish seniors have a point. “Romance” conjures idyllic images of flustered lovers tossing crumpled pages of poetry over their shoulders as they strive for perfection, of sweating palms and quivering voices and stuttered date requests.  Instead, we are forced to decipher nuanced messages and text delays rather than reading facial expressions and feeling the real human chemistry upon which romance is fundamentally based.

Dates are arranged through sterile texting back-and-forths, and the clarity of meaning and ease of etiquette leave much to be desired. “He didn’t respond for two hours – does that mean I shouldn’t respond for two hours?” “She updated her Places as The Back Abbey… but she told me she was at the library?” “He put a smiley face! Does that mean he wants to get married?” (Yes.)

There is, however, another side to this evolution. Melendez said she believes texting “allows people to think (and overthink) their responses, which can be completely fake.”  I personally view this as an upside – the ability to create an illusion. “hey grl wats gd 2night?” “nada, just got back from a party, supes dressed up in heels and lipstick, gna kick it at an afterparty for a lil.” Actually, I’m in my pajamas eating Krispy Kremes and stalking your Facebook, but you’ll never know that and now I’m sexy.

Kutcher waxes poetically and suggests that grammatical errors are marks of fragility and imperfection, of showing our lovers our flawed selves.

I see it more as a means of weeding out the dumb ones and establishing relationship hierarchy; if you mistake “your” for “you’re” more than twice I’m unlikely to recruit your DNA for my future children, and if my texts contain grammatical errors, accept that I don’t care enough about you to take the time to type properly.

Especially since my iPhone automatically does it for me.

Perhaps romance in the time of the text message is not dead but merely altered. 

Displays of affection may have moved from floral bouquets to i

Previous articleNBA: Warriors regain their offensive spark in edging Nuggets
Next articleHenry T. Higashi
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here