In regards to the article “Deeper discussion offered on proposed oil exploration rules” (San Benito County Today, Oct. 26, 2012), I wish to correct a statement in the article. The article suggested I opposed the role of a petroleum administrator.  In fact the opposite is true.  My concern is that the county will not be able to afford a petroleum administrator and the task will fall to the Planning Department. The current draft petroleum ordinance is very complex, duplicates state and federal regulation, and may overburden the planning department.

Unfortunately I ran out of time before finishing my remarks, but I would suggest the county engage the services of a consulting petroleum engineer to act as the Petroleum Administrator (an office already allowed for under the current ordinance). Other counties in California have done this with success while saving money.

Ralph Combs, Manager, Corporate Development, The Termo Company

Previous articleWater Cooler: Should cities fund costs of pro sports teams’ parades?
Next articleStrike spoils the week for Nob Hill
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here