Editorial: District willing to do anything for votes
San Benito High School officials' use of that curious incentive – to cut students' detention hours if their parents attended a facilities renovation forum – was pulled from a broader playbook. That playbook's theme is this: Do whatever it takes to get the necessary number of votes to OK a $39 million school bond.
Water Cooler: Should states have right to drug test welfare applicants?
Richard Place: “Why not? I thought assisted suicide was illegal.”
Cheers to open government; jeers to the tragic accident on Hwy. 156
Thumbs up for county supervisors who made it easier to see who is contributing to county elected officials' campaigns. The supervisors voted to post everyone'sForm 460 – which details contributions and must be filed by all candidates – on the Internet. That shines a welcome ray of sunshine on the source of the cash that fuels all races. Supervisors also deserve kudos for beginning to develop a plan to limit campaign spending and donations. We hope the restrictions are reasonable enough to allow candidates to collect enough to fund a campaign, but stringent enough to allow newcomers to compete with incumbents.
Marty: Bullet train or the Boondoggle Express?
In November 2008, California voters passed Proposition 1A, the High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act, 53 percent to 47 percent. It authorized $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds to help, ostensibly, fund a $40 billion, 800-mile bullet train. Now, only three years later with nothing built the estimated costs have skyrocketed to $98.5 billion, the completion date has been pushed out nine years to 2033, and the maximum annual ridership estimate has shrunk by 18 million. At what point do the misstatements or gross errors that formed the original premise of Prop 1A invalidate the election results?





