Panelists answered the following: Was the “Los Valientes” suit against former Supervisor Richard Scagliotti, who lost the case after 11 and a half years, worth the time and effort?
Mary Zanger: Yes! To know the truth and to see justice served becomes a rare gift. Truth is priceless. But I am devastated to learn that Richard Scagliotti who gained my trust and vote then deceived me and other taxpayers to enrich himself. Thank you to the Pekins and to “Los Valientes” for pursuing justice. I hope this serves as a warning to those officials who serve their own interests over those of the common good and their own constituents.
Ruth Erickson: Though this went on for a long time, far too long, it should be realized as a serious reminder for all elected officials to avoid agenda items which could potentially benefit themselves. Legal counsel should strongly advise elected officials to recuse themselves when agenda items could be a conflict of interest.
Bill Mifsud: Yes! Transparency by elected officials is a critical element in the performance of their duties for our system of government.
Richard Herrera: No. Once we take a closer look at this case I believe most will agree it was a waste of time and money. Let’s move on.
Nants Foley: I think the only winner in this one is the attorney.
Jim West: Yes. The wheels of justice may turn slowly, but they do turn. A dozen years later few remember what an act of bravery it was to stand up to Supervisor Scagliotti. “Boss Hog” as he was known in the media could really hurt a guy and Mr. Kelley took some lumps—but in the end it was Mr. Kelley, not Scagliotti, who was the winner.
