I really should be writing Marty himself, but since he either is employed by or writes regularly for your paper I am holding you responsible. His most recent column on the school bond issue is not totally accurate, and his continued verbal abuse of San Benito High School must stop. First his criticism of our failure to reach the desired AYP number is correct, but as he almost always does, he uses the statistics to say whatever he wants them to. Clearly not every student at San Benito High School is performing at the level that the federal and state governments say they should. Let’s take a closer look. What Marty fails to point out is how many kids get moved from one test scoring band to another. For example, from far below basic to basic, from basic to proficient, from proficient to advanced. This is a more accurate measure of how well a school is performing. If you take a student and advance him or her to a higher level, that is a good thing. Not all students start from the same baseline level. Next his point about the fact that different subgroups are not performing actually works against his demands for improved accountability for potential bond money. The fact that all subgroups regardless of race are not performing well is a great reason why the bond should pass. He talks about the mission being to educate students – actually the mission of San Benito High School District is “To educate all students to their highest potential so that they will have the maximum number of options upon graduation”. Phase 1 of the construction project is the vocational buildings (which he inaccurately reports in his column). All of the research and newspaper articles indicate that the vast majority of jobs in the next 20 years are going to be in service-related industries. Welding being at or near the top of that list, heating and air conditioning, plumbing, auto repair, etc. Jobs that require additional training after high school, but do not require A to G, (the CSU) qualifications to succeed in. What about these students’ options? He constantly harps on athletics and inflated egos. Well inflate this: Athletes have on average a 0.83 higher G.P.A. than non-athletes. Look around the town of Hollister and see how many local successful people are former athletes. And it is pretty embarrassing when you are trying to play tennis and you fall in a fissure big enough to swallow up a small mammal. My understanding is during the second phase of bond construction in order to build new classrooms the swimming pool would have to be moved, and possibly the tennis and basketball courts. Maybe this could be considered placing athletic facilities above classrooms, but the school is building the weight room/wrestling room on its own. What athletic facilities is he talking about? Marty have you ever set foot on the campus of San Benito High School? Have you ever swam in the pool? Which by the way it is the only public swimming pool in San Benito County. Have you ever attended a BLT, ever been to a football game, wrestling match, school site council meeting? Did you attend the special education prom? Ever heard of circle of friends? Are you going to senior parents night? Did you conveniently fail to mention that a student in this year’s graduating class is receiving a Bill Gates scholarship. And unless my math is incorrect there are (counting your column) six articles in this week’s paper about the school. Maybe you should try using your influence and position to try and build up the school, find solutions to problems, offer congratulations to those who do well. And as I like to point out to the kids “Be a leader of good and not of evil”. The beauty of San Benito High School is that the person is the program, and as someone who has shed blood literally as well as figuratively for the kids, both athletes and non athletes, for 28 years I resent your constant criticism of the school, and suggest you try actually finding out what is going on there before you take any more pot shots.
Randy Logue, SBHS teacher
