Thanks to staff writers Jessica Quandt and Erin Musgrave for
helping us through the issues. It seems to me that this second
recall attempt is a frantic diversionary activity seeking to keep
the real issues hidden.
Editor,

Thanks to staff writers Jessica Quandt and Erin Musgrave for helping us through the issues. It seems to me that this second recall attempt is a frantic diversionary activity seeking to keep the real issues hidden.

Who are the clients of the lawyers trying to muzzle John Sarsfield? Why did the Pekins vote for the recall when it is clearly a conflict of interest?

As for me, John Sarsfield doing his job best serves my constitutional rights. I want to know who are the Los Valientes. Who are the clients of these few lawyers who have out-of-town offices?

Jaime De La Cruz’s supervisor position is under a cloud because of his misdemeanor. His spokesperson, Ignacio Velazquez, has no respect for election laws and seems to have a hidden agenda.

We may never know the identity of the dog poisoners, but we can know the identity of Los Valientes. That will be a beginning. We must know real issues. Our city and county are at stake. John Sarsfield works for us.

Mary T. Zanger, Hollister

Previous articleSan Juan says no casino
Next articleMystery: cure for the common cold
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here