Letter: Resident upset about AG, courts with Prop. 8 issue

An interesting topic came up at church this Sunday morning which made me think about the current debate over California’s Proposition 8 and the Supreme courts decision; that made me decide to write a letter to the editor. It’s really not about Prop. 8, but about how the whole issue has been handled, and how if I were an attorney I would feel that a large group of people would have a pretty good case. Whether or not you voted for or against Prop. 8 the bottom line is that at the time it passed by a 52 to 48 (or something close to this margin). Now maybe it was a close vote, but it was certified and legal and became the law of the land. At some point the attorney general of California decided that it was her right, or moral imperative, or just plain opinion to not defend it in court. The supreme court ruled that the party who did defend it had no legal standing and it was ruled against. I guess my question about this whole process is how can a law which was passed by the people of a state (and there are more than one going on right now) be ignored by a person, office or political party who happens to be in charge at the time? It bothers me that accused and convicted criminals are appointed legal representation, illegal aliens are given due process before being deported, a student and his parents may appeal to the superintendent or school board about an issue, but the 52% of voters of the state of California who voted for Prop 8 (and I would guess about 99% of whom are law abiding citizens), were not represented by the attorney general of the state that they represent. And as much as that bothers me I could actually respect the attorney general if for reasons of moral conscience she failed to defend the law, but if she didn’t someone else should have. Basically all the people who voted for Prop. 8 were denied their legal rights. No one represented them in state supreme court, no one represented them in the United State Supreme court. It was always about fighting against the unconstitutionality of the law, and the rights of those people whom were being discriminated against, but what about the rights of those people who voted for the proposition. what about the people of the state of California? Don’t they have rights also? Again I am not trying to debate the topic of same sex marriage – it could have been any of the hot-button social topics of the day, legalizing marijuana, abortion, affirmative action, etc. The idea is that the people of a state vote on a proposition it passes, and becomes a law. Then someone challenges it and a elected official refuses to defend the will of the people, and no one takes their place. That is wrong, and everyone should be represented: even in an unpopular issue or controversial belief. That is the American way.
Randy Logue, Hollister