I supported Al Gore in the 2000 election and I greatly respect
him, but his nomination of Howard Dean for the Democratic
nomination was premature, foolhardy and political. Not only is Dean
the choice of Gore, he is also the choice of the Republicans and
they are showing it through huge donations to his campaign.
I supported Al Gore in the 2000 election and I greatly respect him, but his nomination of Howard Dean for the Democratic nomination was premature, foolhardy and political. Not only is Dean the choice of Gore, he is also the choice of the Republicans and they are showing it through huge donations to his campaign. They know that he is the one who would be easiest to beat in the general election as he trails Bush in almost every single state. Simply having higher polls in New Hampshire does not mean a thing. Being able to win in 2004 is what matters and Howard Dean just doesn’t have what it takes.

Bryan Thompson,

Lisle, Ill.

Previous articleGavilan can’t hold lead
Next articleCuts will affect all city workers
Dan Pulcrano is the publisher of the Tri-City Voice and a longtime journalist based in the Santa Clara Valley.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here